As I said at the end of the last piece I wrote this will cover the VA’s process to find someone incompetent compared to a states required procedures. I think there is something very wrong with the differences. I believe most people out there will agree with me.
When you go through compensation and pension for any reason the evaluator can find you incompetent to handle your benefits. He reports that up with the rest of his findings and the manager in your area will go from their with appointing someone to take control of your benefits. They sometimes will do a supervised direct pay which means you get paid but have to prove what you paid and why. N now first of what is the definition of an incompetent person. It is “a person that because of injury or mental illness is nit capable of handling their own business or affairs.”
Through the VA rating agencies have sole authority to declare a veteran incompetent. They are required for due process to send you a letter giving you the opportunity to schedule a hearing and challenge those findings. If for whatever reason you do not receive this letter they will proceed however they see fit to take control of your benefits. Challenging their findings and trying to regain control of your benefits at that point becomes incredibly difficult. By the way if you check yourself into a hospital even if it is to adjust or correct your medications (psychiatric) that can be a basis to find you incompetent. Also if you go to rehab for help they can find you incompetent for that as well. Before I cover why this is incredibly unfair to a lot of people that ask for that type of help to keep functioning properly let us go over the states requirements before finding someone incompetent.
This is accurate in most states.
Step one: a petition for guardianship must be filed with the probate court that has jurisdiction. This is required whether it is the state, care giver or family member that is trying to have someone found incompetent.
Step two: consult an attorney familiar with guardianship issues in that state.
Step three: there has to be a psychiatric evaluation scheduled for the individual that is believed to be incompetent. If this person refuses to go to the appointment or dies not cooperate to the best of their ability at this appointment then the court may be petitioned for a compulsory evaluation as part of your guardianship petition. A compulsory evaluation is they force you to undergo an evaluation, often as inpatient, and is much less likely to favor the person. This is not the same as a 72 hour hold for your own welfare.
Step four: you must have a copy of the evaluation turned in to the court attached to their forms. I will try to attach one such form from Ohio. If that doesn’t work there is a link to this firm at
http://blogs.findlaw.com/law_and_life/2013/09/legal-how-to-declaring-someone-incompetent.html
Step five: the psychological expert for the courts will go over the evaluation and turn in his opinion to the judge as evidence.
Step six: you have to go to a hearing with all of your evidence and supporting documents. This is on top of everything else. At this point you should be able to get a ruling from the court of the action they find most fitting.
Side note most states require if the person you are trying to have found incompetent is an adult them adult protective services has to be informed to run an investigation of their own.
There is a world of difference in these methodologies to finding a person incompetent. The way the states do this, although harder to get out of if found incompetent, is leaps and bounds better than having one individual interview you and make that declaration. As there are many people like me that have mental illness that use the hospitals to help get our medications back on track. That is not saying we can’t handle our own benefits. Are all of us great with money or could we be Warren Buffet types? No. Are we capable of far more than some of these evaluators give us credit for? Hell yes. Should there be a more lengthy or in depth process to follow before this type of tag is stuck on us? I think there has to be. Since I have been deemed supposedly incompetent, and I have been rated competent recently, I am not even supposed to own firearms. I have never been charged or arrested fir any reason let alone violent offenses. I want to hunt as a way to stock the house with meat. I love venison, rabbit and elk. As a United States Marine I love shooting rifles whether it be at cans or shooting ranges. What happened to our rights as veterans that are being labeled and tagged as incompetent because we sought help or went to a compensation and pension exam and answered the evaluators questions? On top of this idiots way of declaring someone incompetent when you have issues with a fiduciary that the VA may assign you the VA will do absolutely nothing to rectify the situation. On top of that, these fiduciaries who don’t want to play by the rules, the VA allows these companies to take 4% of your pay. The VA says if there is a family member able to do it that is the preference of the VA. I don’t believe that for a minute. The next post is going to go over field examiners, the fiduciary hub and how if your in a bad situation with your fiduciary the only way to get out.